That's NeuralModel catalog

z-ai

Z.ai: GLM 5.2

z-ai/glm-5.2

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

GLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agent workflows, project-level software engineering,...

Specifications

Model ID
z-ai/glm-5.2
Canonical ID
z-ai/glm-5.2-20260616
Creator
z-ai
Added to OpenRouter
16.06.2026
Context length
1,048,576
Modality
text->text
Input modalities
text
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $0.0070 / out $6.8
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualityNo measurementreasoning: optional · default high · efforts: xhigh, high, none · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingAA — next 20% of the cohort—
AgentsAA — next 20% of the cohortparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: optional · default high · efforts: xhigh, high, none · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurement—
VisionNo measurement—
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurement—
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisCoding index68.8AA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Artificial AnalysisAgentic index38.4AA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · agenticgamedevwin rate 49.7% · rank 91,157EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · androidnativewin rate 52.7% · rank 231,169EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · blender3dwin rate 36.1% · rank 22983EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · fullstackwin rate 60.1% · rank 141,219EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · godotgamedevwin rate 40.1% · rank 211,142EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · htmlslideswin rate 49.4% · rank 151,071EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · mobileappswin rate 47.5% · rank 291,155EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · pdfwin rate 59.3% · rank 81,243EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · python-pptxslideswin rate 48.5% · rank 181,156EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · spreadsheetwin rate 37.9% · rank 271,071EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · webappswin rate 55.7% · rank 191,205EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 52.8% · rank 241,269EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · asciiartwin rate 46.4% · rank 301,186EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 50.6% · rank 261,278EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · datavizwin rate 51.7% · rank 161,283EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 49.2% · rank 311,258EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · svgwin rate 47.5% · rank 291,198EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 55.4% · rank 231,288EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 49.9% · rank 251,278EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
Relacefp41,048,576$0.0066$7.98——100%
Waferfp41,048,576$0.0070$6.8——100%
Baidufp81,048,576$0.189$0.594——100%
Waferfp41,048,576$0.190$8——100%
Cloudflare262,144$0.190$8——100%
StreamLakefp81,024,000$0.280$0.880——100%
DeepInfrafp41,048,576$0.450$1.44———
DeepInfrafp41,048,576$0.563$1.8——100%
Morphfp81,048,576$0.595$1.83——100%
Ambientfp8202,752$0.600$2——100%
CoreWeavefp41,048,576$0.620$2.42——100%
Novitafp81,048,576$0.650$2.04——100%
SiliconFlowfp81,048,576$0.651$2.05——100%
DigitalOcean1,048,576$0.700$2.2——100%
AtlasCloudfp81,048,576$0.938$2.95———
Alibabafp81,000,000$0.966$3.04——100%
Alibabafp81,000,000$1.12$3.52——100%
Nebiusfp41,048,576$1.4$4.4——72.73%
Mistralnvfp41,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
BaseTenfp81,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Inceptronfp41,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Together1,048,575$1.4$4.4——100%
BaseTenfp81,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Venicefp81,000,000$1.4$4.4——100%
GMICloudfp81,048,576$1.4$4.4———
Parasailfp4262,144$1.4$4.4——100%
Friendli1,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Z.AIfp81,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Mistral1,048,576$1.54$4.84——100%
BaseTenfp81,048,576$2.1$6.6——100%
BaseTenfp81,048,576$2.1$6.6——100%
Baidufp41,048,576$2.25$7.88——100%
Alibabafp81,000,000$2.31$7.26———

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026

No published articles identify this model yet.