That's NeuralModel catalog

openai

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

openai/gpt-5.3-codex

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

OpenRouter’s catalog presents openai/gpt-5.3-codex as an OpenAI coding model intended for agentic software work, with text, image, and file inputs and text output. It lists a large context window, optional adjustable reasoning, tool calling, structured outputs, and response controls. The catalog also reports Design Arena results across coding and design categories. Because this evidence is catalog-only and no independent model card was supplied, its described capabilities and measured results should be validated against the intended workload.[1]

Strengths

  • Catalog-listed inputs accept text, images, and files while returning text.[1]
  • Reasoning is optional, defaults to medium effort, and supports several levels.[1]
  • Tools, structured outputs, seeds, response formats, token limits, and verbosity are listed.[1]

Limitations

  • Only OpenRouter catalog evidence was supplied; an independent model card was not available in this source pack.[1]
  • Described coding ability and Design Arena results are not workload guarantees; validate on representative tasks.[1]
  • License terms, knowledge cutoff, deployment requirements, and safety behavior are not specified.[1]

Where to use it

  • Consider evaluating it for agentic coding assistants or software-maintenance agents that may use tools.[1]
  • Potentially useful for code review or debugging grounded in source files, logs, images, or supplied documents.[1]
  • Try a pilot where adjustable reasoning effort and machine-readable text outputs matter.[1]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · OpenAI: GPT-5.3-CodexSources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

GPT-5.3-Codex is OpenAI’s most advanced agentic coding model, combining the frontier software engineering performance of GPT-5.2-Codex with the broader reasoning and professional knowledge capabilities of GPT-5.2. It achieves state-of-the-art results...

Specifications

Model ID
openai/gpt-5.3-codex
Canonical ID
openai/gpt-5.3-codex-20260224
Creator
openai
Added to OpenRouter
24.02.2026
Context length
400,000
Modality
text+image+file->text
Input modalities
text, image, file
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $1.75 / out $14
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualityNo measurementreasoning: optional · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low, none · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingNo measurement—
AgentsNo measurementparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: optional · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low, none · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurementinput: file
VisionNo measurementinput: image
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurement—
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Design Arenaagents · androidnativewin rate 35.2% · rank 361,084EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · fullstackwin rate 36.5% · rank 44961EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · godotgamedevwin rate 45.1% · rank 271,124EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · mobileappswin rate 41.4% · rank 491,048EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · webappswin rate 36.9% · rank 451,014EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 35.3% · rank 119991EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · asciiartwin rate 51.2% · rank 441,147EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 47.2% · rank 941,135EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · datavizwin rate 50.6% · rank 771,162EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 51.3% · rank 761,152EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · svgwin rate 54% · rank 621,121EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 47.3% · rank 911,128EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 48.6% · rank 911,157EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
Azure400,000$1.75$14———
OpenAI400,000$1.75$14——100%
OpenAI400,000$3.5$28———

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026

No published articles identify this model yet.