meta
Meta: Muse Voice Transcribe 1.0
meta/muse-voice-transcribe-1.0
Our take
AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.
According to the OpenRouter catalog, meta/muse-voice-transcribe-1.0 is Meta's synchronous speech-to-text model, accepting audio and returning a transcription. The catalog describes it as suited to push-to-talk interactions, endpointing, and speaker-aware transcription, with keyword biasing for domain terminology and language biasing; the language-biasing details are truncated in the supplied record. No measured performance results or independent model card were included, so these capabilities should be treated as source-reported and validated against the intended workload.[1]
Strengths
Limitations
- Only OpenRouter catalog evidence was supplied; an independent model card was unavailable.[1]
- No benchmark measurements were provided, so accuracy, latency, and robustness require workload validation.[1]
- Supported languages, audio formats, duration limits, and integration constraints are not specified.[1]
Where to use it
Sources
- [1] OpenRouter catalog · Meta: Muse Voice Transcribe 1.0Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026
About this model
Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.
Muse Voice Transcribe 1.0 is a synchronous speech-to-text model from Meta. It is suited for push-to-talk, endpointing, and speaker-aware transcription, with keyword biasing for domain terms and language biasing through...
Specifications
- Model ID
- meta/muse-voice-transcribe-1.0
- Canonical ID
- meta/muse-voice-transcribe-1.0-20260903
- Creator
- meta
- Added to OpenRouter
- 11.09.2026
- Context length
- 0
- Modality
- audio->transcription
- Input modalities
- audio
- Output modalities
- transcription
- Token pricing
- No per-token price in the source snapshot — see OpenRouter for the billing unit
- Knowledge cutoff
- —
- Expiration date
- —
Tasks and capabilities
A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.
| Task | Grade | Source-declared capability |
|---|---|---|
| General quality | No measurement | — |
| Coding | No measurement | — |
| Agents | No measurement | — |
| Writing | No measurement | — |
| Reasoning | No measurement | — |
| Document analysis | No measurement | — |
| Vision | No measurement | — |
| Image generation | No measurement | — |
| Audio | No measurement | input: audio |
| Video | No measurement | — |
| Embeddings | No measurement | — |
Evaluations
No evaluations are supplied for this model.
How grades work
Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.
- S — S — top 10% of the cohort
- A — A — next 20% of the cohort
- B — B — next 30% of the cohort
- C — C — below the B band
Providers
Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.
| Provider | Context length | Price in /1M | Price out /1M | Latency p50 (30m, s) | Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s) | Uptime (30m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta | 0 | — | — | — | — | 100% |
Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026
Related articles
No published articles identify this model yet.