That's NeuralModel catalog

meta

Meta: Muse Spark Open

meta/muse-spark-open

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

The OpenRouter catalog describes Meta's Muse Spark Open (meta/muse-spark-open) as an open-weight model tuned for agentic coding, claiming strong first-attempt accuracy, dependable tool calling, and deep codebase understanding. It accepts text, image, file, audio, and video inputs, returns text only, offers a context window of roughly one million tokens, and requires reasoning with adjustable effort. Catalog arena results look mid-pack and some evaluation fields are empty. Only OpenRouter data was supplied; an independent model card was not available in this source pack.[1]

Strengths

  • Catalog-reported: an open-weight model trained for agentic coding workflows, claiming higher first-attempt accuracy, reliable tool calling, and deep codebase understanding.[1]
  • Accepts text, image, file, audio, and video inputs with text output and a context window of about one million tokens.[1]
  • Reasoning effort is tunable across four levels, and the endpoint advertises tool-calling and structured-output parameters.[1]

Limitations

  • All evidence comes from the OpenRouter catalog; no independent model card was included in this source pack, so claimed capabilities and results should be validated on real workloads.[1]
  • Reasoning is mandatory and cannot be disabled, which may matter for latency- or cost-sensitive applications.[1]
  • Evaluation coverage is incomplete: the catalog lists no coding or agentic index values, and its Design Arena results appear mixed across categories.[1]

Where to use it

  • Worth evaluating for agentic coding assistants that need long repository context and tool use.[1]
  • A candidate for workflows that feed screenshots, files, or other multimodal inputs into a text-producing assistant.[1]
  • Potentially suitable where adjustable reasoning effort and structured outputs are required; confirm fit with workload tests.[1]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · Meta: Muse Spark OpenSources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

Muse Spark Open is a coding-optimized open-weight model. Trained specifically for agentic coding workflows, it delivers higher first-attempt accuracy, reliable tool calling, and deep codebase understanding across the repos developers...

Specifications

Model ID
meta/muse-spark-open
Canonical ID
meta/muse-spark-open-20261015
Creator
meta
Added to OpenRouter
15.10.2026
Context length
1,048,576
Modality
text+image+file+audio+video->text
Input modalities
text, image, video, file, audio
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $1.25 / out $4.25
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualityBB — next 30% of the cohortreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingNo measurement—
AgentsNo measurementparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurementinput: file
VisionNo measurementinput: image
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurementinput: audio
VideoNo measurementinput: video
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisIntelligence index24.9BB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 46.4% · rank 271,259EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 51.5% · rank 151,303EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 47.8% · rank 291,263EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 51.6% · rank 151,314EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 51.7% · rank 121,307EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
Modal1,000,000$1.25$4.25——100%
Together1,048,576$1.25$4.25——100%
Nebiusfp41,048,576$1.25$4.25——100%
BaseTenfp41,048,576$1.25$4.25——100%

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026

No published articles identify this model yet.