That's NeuralModel catalog

google

Google: Gemini 4 Carbon

google/gemini-4-carbon

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

According to its OpenRouter catalog listing, google/gemini-4-carbon is a Google Gemini 4 family model positioned for coding, agentic, and complex reasoning work. The listing describes multimodal input (text, image, audio, video, and files) with text output, a context window of about one million tokens, and always-on reasoning with adjustable effort. The catalog also reports design-arena evaluations and a third-party intelligence index. Because the only evidence is the OpenRouter listing and no independent model card was supplied in this source pack, these capabilities are source-reported rather than independently verified.[1]

Strengths

  • Broad multimodal input: the catalog lists text, image, audio, video, and file inputs, which suits mixed-media workloads.[1]
  • Very long context window per the listing, suited to large documents or codebases in a single prompt.[1]
  • The listing reports reasoning with adjustable effort levels and support for tool calling and structured outputs.[1]

Limitations

  • Evidence is catalog-only: no independent model card was available in this source pack, so reported capabilities and evaluations need validation on real workloads.[1]
  • Per the listing, reasoning is mandatory and cannot be fully disabled, which may affect latency or cost for simple requests.[1]
  • Output is text only; knowledge cutoff and license terms are not listed, so those remain unknown.[1]

Where to use it

  • Editorial suggestion: agentic, tool-using coding assistants, matching the listing's positioning and its tool and structured-output parameters.[1]
  • Editorial suggestion: analysis of long or mixed-media inputs, such as documents with images or audio and video content, given the reported modalities and context window.[1]
  • Editorial suggestion: complex reasoning tasks where the adjustable reasoning effort can be tuned per request.[1]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · Google: Gemini 4 CarbonSources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

Gemini 4 Carbon is a frontier Gemini 4 model from Google for coding, agentic and complex reasoning work. It takes text, image, audio, video and file input, supports long decode...

Specifications

Model ID
google/gemini-4-carbon
Canonical ID
google/gemini-4-carbon-20261110
Creator
google
Added to OpenRouter
10.11.2026
Context length
1,048,576
Modality
text+image+file+audio+video->text
Input modalities
audio, file, image, text, video
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $2 / out $10
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualitySS — top 10% of the cohortreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingNo measurement—
AgentsNo measurementparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurementinput: file
VisionNo measurementinput: image
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurementinput: audio
VideoNo measurementinput: video
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisIntelligence index60SS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · pdfwin rate 67.9% · rank 11,311EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 67.9% · rank 61,415EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 57.4% · rank 101,330EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 55.6% · rank 131,320EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 60.5% · rank 81,346EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 53.3% · rank 171,295EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
Google AI Studio1,048,576$1$5——100%
Google1,048,576$2$10——100%
Google AI Studio1,048,576$2$10——100%
Google1,048,576$2.2$11——100%
Google1,048,576$2.2$11——100%
Google1,048,576$3.6$18———
Google AI Studio1,048,576$3.6$18———

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026