That's NeuralModel catalog

anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.2

anthropic/claude-fable-5.2

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.2 (canonical ID anthropic/claude-fable-5.2-20261109) is described in the OpenRouter catalog as the vendor's most capable model for demanding technical work, with reported gains over Fable 5.1 in coding, reasoning, and vision. It accepts text, image, and file inputs and returns text, with a one-million-token context window. Reasoning is mandatory with selectable effort levels. Catalog-listed arena measurements cover design and coding categories, but only catalog data was supplied; no independent model card was available in this source pack.[1]

Strengths

  • Vendor-reported strength in coding, reasoning, and vision over the prior Fable 5.1 generation; the catalog also lists measured arena results across design, agent, and coding-related categories.[1]
  • Broad input surface: text, image, and file inputs with text output, plus a very large context window.[1]
  • Mandatory reasoning with five selectable effort levels, and API support for tools, tool choice, structured outputs, and verbosity control.[1]

Limitations

  • All evidence comes from the OpenRouter catalog; no independent model card was available in this source pack, so vendor-reported capability claims and catalog benchmark listings should be validated on real workloads before adoption.[1]
  • Reasoning cannot be disabled (only its effort can be tuned), and the knowledge cutoff is not reported; some catalog benchmark fields are also empty.[1]

Where to use it

  • Demanding technical work such as coding assistance and reasoning-heavy analysis, per the vendor description relayed by the catalog — worth piloting before committing.[1]
  • Multimodal document workflows: the catalog lists image and file inputs alongside text, and arena measurements include PDF-oriented agent tasks.[1]
  • Tool-using agents and structured-output pipelines, given supported parameters for tools, tool choice, and response formatting.[1]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.2Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

Claude Fable 5.2 is Anthropic's most capable model for the most demanding technical work, with gains over Fable 5.1 in coding, reasoning, and vision. In prerelease testing it completed otherwise-infeasible...

Specifications

Model ID
anthropic/claude-fable-5.2
Canonical ID
anthropic/claude-fable-5.2-20261109
Creator
anthropic
Added to OpenRouter
09.11.2026
Context length
1,000,000
Modality
text+image+file->text
Input modalities
text, image, file
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $8 / out $40
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualitySS — top 10% of the cohortreasoning: mandatory · default high · efforts: max, xhigh, high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingNo measurement—
AgentsNo measurementparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default high · efforts: max, xhigh, high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurementinput: file
VisionNo measurementinput: image
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurement—
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisIntelligence index64.6SS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · mobileappswin rate 65.5% · rank 21,323EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · pdfwin rate 68.2% · rank 31,306EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 76.8% · rank 11,516EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 62.7% · rank 31,374EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 65.2% · rank 51,399EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 61.1% · rank 51,361EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 60.6% · rank 31,353EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
Google1,000,000$8$40——100%
Amazon Bedrock1,000,000$8$40———
Azure1,000,000$8$40——33.33%
Anthropic1,000,000$8$40——73.33%
Anthropic1,000,000$16$80———

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026