That's NeuralModel catalog

z-ai

Z.ai: GLM 5.3

z-ai/glm-5.3

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

z-ai/glm-5.3 is a text-only reasoning model positioned for complex software engineering and long-horizon agent work. Its model card says it shares GLM-5.2's base, with gains coming from post-training, and describes an open-weights release with a 1M-token context window. Reasoning is mandatory and defaults to maximum effort, although high and low settings are available. Vendor-reported benchmarks emphasize coding, terminal, cyber and tool-use tasks, while OpenRouter lists additional catalog evaluations. These results should be treated as source-reported evidence, not independently verified performance.[1][2]

Strengths

  • The catalog lists a 1M-token context, tool calling and structured outputs.[1]
  • Reasoning effort defaults to maximum and can be explicitly set to high or low.[1][2]
  • The model card describes open weights and local serving through vLLM, SGLang and Transformers.[2]

Limitations

  • Only text input and output are listed; image, audio and video support are not documented.[1]
  • Reasoning cannot be disabled in the catalog; only the effort level can be changed.[1][2]
  • The pack contains catalog and vendor material only; independent verification, safety-behavior evidence, hardware needs and custom-license terms are absent, so workload validation is necessary.[1][2]

Where to use it

  • Editorial suggestion: coding assistants and software-engineering agents for large codebases, after validating correctness on real repositories.[1][2]
  • Editorial suggestion: long-horizon tool-use or workflow-automation prototypes that need structured outputs and controllable reasoning effort.[1][2]
  • Editorial suggestion: controlled defensive vulnerability-discovery research, given the card's reported cyber benchmarks; real-world safety and reliability remain unproven.[2]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · Z.ai: GLM 5.3Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026
  2. [2] Model documentation · Z.ai: GLM 5.3Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

GLM-5.3 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai, built for complex software engineering and long-horizon agent tasks. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and improves...

Specifications

Model ID
z-ai/glm-5.3
Canonical ID
z-ai/glm-5.3-20260816
Creator
z-ai
Added to OpenRouter
18.08.2026
Context length
1,048,576
Modality
text->text
Input modalities
text
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $0.084 / out $3.6
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualityBB — next 30% of the cohortreasoning: mandatory · default max · efforts: max, high, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingAA — next 20% of the cohort—
AgentsSS — top 10% of the cohortparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default max · efforts: max, high, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurement—
VisionNo measurement—
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurement—
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisIntelligence index31.7BB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Artificial AnalysisCoding index74.8AA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Artificial AnalysisAgentic index53.1SS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 56% · rank 191,299EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · asciiartwin rate 47.2% · rank 231,210EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 52.3% · rank 211,285EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · datavizwin rate 50.6% · rank 341,253EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 50.6% · rank 211,290EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · svgwin rate 51.4% · rank 171,248EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 52.8% · rank 261,284EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 52.6% · rank 231,280EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · htmlslideswin rate 39.1% · rank 21,189EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · mobileappswin rate 52.2% · rank 231,186EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · python-pptxslideswin rate 50.4% · rank 101,206EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · webappswin rate 54.2% · rank 101,270EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
Waferfp41,048,576$0.070$1.4——100%
Relacefp41,048,576$0.070$4.38——100%
InferenceNetfp41,048,576$0.084$3.6——100%
InferenceNetfp41,048,576$0.084$3.6——100%
Reka1,048,576$0.150$3——100%
Waferfp41,048,576$0.179$1.4——100%
AkashMLfp41,048,576$0.190$4.4——100%
DeepInfrafp41,048,576$0.563$2.5——100%
Baidufp81,048,576$0.570$1.79——100%
Tenstorrentfp81,044,480$0.600$2.5——100%
Novitafp81,048,576$0.630$1.98——100%
Morphfp81,048,576$0.643$1.98——100%
Decartfp41,048,576$0.690$2.15——100%
SiliconFlowfp81,048,576$0.700$2.2——100%
GMICloudfp81,048,576$0.700$2.2——100%
Cloudflare1,048,576$0.700$2.2——100%
CoreWeavenvfp41,048,576$0.750$3——100%
Sail Researchfp81,048,576$0.750$3——100%
DigitalOcean1,048,576$0.910$2.86——100%
Coherenvfp41,048,576$0.950$3.5——100%
Fireworks1,048,576$0.980$3.08——100%
Makorafp41,048,576$1$4——100%
Inceptronfp41,048,576$1$4.2——100%
Sail Researchfp81,048,576$1.05$4.2——100%
Alibaba1,000,000$1.19$3.74——100%
Friendli1,048,576$1.26$3.96——100%
SambaNova1,048,576$1.4$4.4———
Mistralnvfp41,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
BaseTenfp41,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Nebiusfp41,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Crusoefp41,048,576$1.4$4.4——93.33%
Venice1,000,000$1.4$4.4———
Together1,048,575$1.4$4.4——100%
Parasailfp81,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Modal1,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
BaseTenfp41,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Fireworks1,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
AtlasCloudfp81,048,576$1.4$4.4———
Z.AIfp81,048,576$1.4$4.4——100%
Mistralnvfp41,048,576$1.54$4.84——100%
Amazon Bedrock1,048,576$1.68$5.28——100%
Parasailfp81,048,576$2.1$6.6——90%
Fireworks1,048,576$2.1$6.6——93.33%
BaseTenfp81,048,576$2.1$6.6——100%
BaseTenfp81,048,576$2.1$6.6——100%
Alibaba1,000,000$2.8$8.8——100%

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026

No published articles identify this model yet.