That's NeuralModel catalog

z-ai

Z.ai: GLM 4.6

z-ai/glm-4.6

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

GLM-4.6 is a text-in, text-out model from Z.ai listed on OpenRouter with a 204,800-token context window and a knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31. Z.ai's model card reports gains over GLM-4.5 in coding, reasoning, tool use, and agentic tasks, plus more refined writing and role-play; these are vendor claims. OpenRouter arena data shows mixed measured results, near or above break-even in most listed design and agent categories but weaker in fullstack and mobile-app agent tasks. Evidence is limited to the vendor card and the catalog, so workload validation is advised.[1][2]

Strengths

  • Context window expanded to roughly 200K tokens, up from 128K in GLM-4.5, per the vendor card and catalog.[1][2]
  • Vendor-reported improvements in coding, reasoning, and tool-using agent behavior; the catalog exposes tools, structured outputs, and reasoning parameters.[1][2]
  • Measured arena results are near or above break-even in most listed design and agent categories.[1]

Limitations

  • Evidence is a vendor model card plus a catalog listing; no independent evaluation was supplied, so results need validation on your workload.[1][2]
  • Text-only input and output in the catalog; no multimodal capability is evidenced.[1]
  • Knowledge cutoff is 2025-03-31, and measured arena performance is mixed, falling below break-even in fullstack and mobile-app agent tasks.[1]

Where to use it

  • Worth evaluating for long-context document or agentic workflows that can use the roughly 200K-token window.[1][2]
  • Candidate for coding assistance and front-end page generation, where the vendor reports gains; verify on your own stack.[1][2]
  • May fit search- and tool-integrated agents, per the vendor card; the catalog confirms tool and reasoning parameters.[1][2]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · Z.ai: GLM 4.6Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026
  2. [2] Model documentation · Z.ai: GLM 4.6Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

Compared with GLM-4.5, this generation brings several key improvements: Longer context window: The context window has been expanded from 128K to 200K tokens, enabling the model to handle more complex...

Specifications

Model ID
z-ai/glm-4.6
Creator
z-ai
Added to OpenRouter
30.09.2025
Context length
204,800
Modality
text->text
Input modalities
text
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $0.500 / out $2
Knowledge cutoff
31.03.2025
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualityNo measurementreasoning: optional · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning
CodingBB — next 30% of the cohort—
AgentsNo measurementparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: optional · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning
Document analysisNo measurement—
VisionNo measurement—
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurement—
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisCoding index45.8BB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · androidnativewin rate 52.8% · rank 371,072EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · fullstackwin rate 42.3% · rank 401,007EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · godotgamedevwin rate 53.2% · rank 151,180EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · mobileappswin rate 47.2% · rank 411,090EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 54.2% · rank 861,111EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 54.3% · rank 851,156EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · datavizwin rate 52.6% · rank 781,159EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 54.8% · rank 791,141EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · svgwin rate 52.1% · rank 661,100EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 52.5% · rank 871,138EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 54.3% · rank 841,167EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
DeepInfrafp4202,752$0.400$1.6———
Venicefp4198,000$0.430$1.75——100%
DeepInfrafp4202,752$0.500$2——100%
Novitabf16204,800$0.550$2.2——100%
Z.AIfp4202,752$0.600$2.2——100%

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026

No published articles identify this model yet.