That's NeuralModel catalog

openai

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b (batch)

openai/gpt-oss-120b:batch

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

openai/gpt-oss-120b:batch is OpenRouter's batch listing of OpenAI's open-weight gpt-oss-120b, a 117B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with 5.1B active parameters per forward pass. The catalog describes a text-to-text model with a large context window, mandatory reasoning adjustable across low, medium, and high effort, and support for tools, structured outputs, and function calling. OpenAI's model card describes the canonical model as Apache-2.0 licensed, fine-tunable, requiring the harmony response format, and sized to run on a single 80GB GPU. Evidence specific to the batch endpoint is thin; validate on your workload.[1][2]

Strengths

  • OpenAI reports open weights under a permissive Apache-2.0 license, with full fine-tuning support for customization.[2]
  • Reasoning effort is configurable (low, medium, high) and the card exposes the full chain-of-thought for debugging; OpenRouter confirms adjustable effort with a medium default.[1][2]
  • The catalog lists a 131,072-token context window plus tool calling, structured outputs, and seed and penalty controls suited to production integrations.[1]

Limitations

  • Evidence for the :batch endpoint is catalog-only; the model card documents the canonical gpt-oss-120b, so batch latency, throughput, and behavior need validation on your workload.[1]
  • OpenAI states the model only works correctly with the harmony response format, an integration constraint for existing stacks.[2]
  • OpenRouter marks reasoning as mandatory, which may add latency to simple prompts; inputs and outputs are text-only and the knowledge cutoff is June 2024.[1]

Where to use it

  • Agentic assistants and pipelines that need function calling, web browsing, or structured outputs, per OpenAI's stated capabilities.[2]
  • Self-hosted or fine-tuned production reasoning workloads for teams able to supply a single 80GB-class GPU.[2]
  • High-volume, non-interactive text jobs where a batch endpoint and adjustable reasoning effort can trade latency for throughput.[1]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b (batch)Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026
  2. [2] Model documentation · OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b (batch)Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

gpt-oss-120b is an open-weight, 117B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model from OpenAI designed for high-reasoning, agentic, and general-purpose production use cases. It activates 5.1B parameters per forward pass and is optimized...

Specifications

Model ID
openai/gpt-oss-120b:batch
Canonical ID
openai/gpt-oss-120b
Creator
openai
Added to OpenRouter
05.08.2025
Context length
131,072
Modality
text->text
Input modalities
text
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $0.030 / out $0.136
Knowledge cutoff
30.06.2024
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualityCC — below the B bandreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingCC — below the B band—
AgentsCC — below the B bandparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurement—
VisionNo measurement—
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurement—
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisIntelligence index3.8CC — below the B band13.11.2026
Artificial AnalysisCoding index30.4CC — below the B band13.11.2026
Artificial AnalysisAgentic index3.7CC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 29.4% · rank 129884EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 33.4% · rank 138953EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · datavizwin rate 43.6% · rank 122985EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 40.5% · rank 127982EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 35.7% · rank 132919EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 32.5% · rank 140961EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
DeepInfrabf16131,072$0.030$0.136———

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026

No published articles identify this model yet.