openai
OpenAI: GPT-5.2
openai/gpt-5.2
Our take
AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.
OpenRouter lists openai/gpt-5.2 as an OpenAI GPT-5-series model exposed through the canonical variant openai/gpt-5.2-20251211. The catalog describes text output with text, image and file inputs, a 400,000-token context window, tool calling, structured outputs, seed, response formatting and verbosity controls. Reasoning is optional with adjustable effort, including none. OpenRouter's description claims stronger agentic and long-context performance than GPT-5.1, but that is source-reported rather than independently validated here; the only evidence is the catalog listing.[1]
Strengths
Limitations
- Evidence is catalog-only; an independent model card was not available in this source pack.[1]
- No measured accuracy, latency, safety, license or hardware data is supplied, so workload validation is needed.[1]
- Arena benchmark entries appear in the catalog, but they are contextual signals rather than a capability guarantee.[1]
Where to use it
Sources
- [1] OpenRouter catalog · OpenAI: GPT-5.2Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026
About this model
Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.
GPT-5.2 is the latest frontier-grade model in the GPT-5 series, offering stronger agentic and long context perfomance compared to GPT-5.1. It uses adaptive reasoning to allocate computation dynamically, responding quickly...
Specifications
- Model ID
- openai/gpt-5.2
- Canonical ID
- openai/gpt-5.2-20251211
- Creator
- openai
- Added to OpenRouter
- 10.12.2025
- Context length
- 400,000
- Modality
- text+image+file->text
- Input modalities
- file, image, text
- Output modalities
- text
- Token pricing
- USD per 1M tokens: in $1.75 / out $14
- Knowledge cutoff
- —
- Expiration date
- —
Tasks and capabilities
A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.
| Task | Grade | Source-declared capability |
|---|---|---|
| General quality | No measurement | reasoning: optional · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low, none · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort |
| Coding | No measurement | — |
| Agents | No measurement | parameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools |
| Writing | No measurement | output: text |
| Reasoning | No measurement | reasoning: optional · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low, none · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort |
| Document analysis | No measurement | input: file |
| Vision | No measurement | input: image |
| Image generation | No measurement | — |
| Audio | No measurement | — |
| Video | No measurement | — |
| Embeddings | No measurement | — |
Evaluations
| Source | Benchmark | Value | Grade | Data retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena | models · websitewin rate 54.4% · rank 69 | 1,187Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · androidnativewin rate 49.1% · rank 38 | 1,045Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · fullstackwin rate 44.3% · rank 39 | 1,020Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · godotgamedevwin rate 48.1% · rank 22 | 1,142Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · mobileappswin rate 46.8% · rank 43 | 1,088Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · webappswin rate 45.5% · rank 41 | 1,068Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · 3dwin rate 41.5% · rank 106 | 1,062Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · codecategorieswin rate 49.6% · rank 80 | 1,160Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · datavizwin rate 56.1% · rank 59 | 1,202Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · gamedevwin rate 56% · rank 63 | 1,185Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · uicomponentwin rate 51.3% · rank 70 | 1,181Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · asciiartwin rate 50.7% · rank 45 | 1,147Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · svgwin rate 53.7% · rank 59 | 1,129Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
How grades work
Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.
- S — S — top 10% of the cohort
- A — A — next 20% of the cohort
- B — B — next 30% of the cohort
- C — C — below the B band
Providers
Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.
| Provider | Context length | Price in /1M | Price out /1M | Latency p50 (30m, s) | Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s) | Uptime (30m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | 400,000 | $0.875 | $7 | — | — | — |
| Azure | 400,000 | $1.75 | $14 | — | — | 100% |
| OpenAI | 400,000 | $1.75 | $14 | — | — | 100% |
| OpenAI | 400,000 | $3.5 | $28 | — | — | 100% |
Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026
Related articles
No published articles identify this model yet.