That's NeuralModel catalog

openai

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex

openai/gpt-5.1-codex

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

OpenRouter’s catalog describes openai/gpt-5.1-codex as an OpenAI GPT-5.1 variant tuned for software engineering and coding workflows, for both interactive sessions and longer autonomous tasks. The same listing reports text plus image inputs, text outputs, a large context window, mandatory reasoning with low, medium and high effort settings, and support for tools and structured outputs. These are catalog claims; an independent model card was not available in this source pack.[1]

Strengths

  • Source-reported specialization for software engineering and coding workflows, including interactive development and extended independent execution.[1]
  • Catalog-listed multimodal input path with text and image in, text out, plus support for tools, tool choice, structured outputs, response format, seed and verbosity controls.[1]
  • Reasoning is mandatory rather than optional, with reported low, medium and high effort settings and medium as the default effort.[1]

Limitations

  • Evidence is catalog-only: this pack lacks an independent model card, so capabilities and behavior should be validated on the intended workload before adoption.[1]
  • The listing includes Design Arena measurements across agent and model categories, but Artificial Analysis data is null; scores and rankings are not restated here.[1]
  • License terms, hardware needs, knowledge cutoff and safety behavior are not specified; output is text-only and reasoning cannot be disabled according to the catalog.[1]

Where to use it

  • Potentially suitable for coding assistants, refactoring, test generation and engineering agents where tool use and structured responses matter, subject to evaluation.[1]
  • May fit workflows that combine screenshots or diagrams with text instructions, because the catalog reports image input with text output.[1]
  • Could be considered for longer coding tasks that benefit from adjustable reasoning effort, while checking cost, latency and reliability in practice.[1]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · OpenAI: GPT-5.1-CodexSources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

GPT-5.1-Codex is a specialized version of GPT-5.1 optimized for software engineering and coding workflows. It is designed for both interactive development sessions and long, independent execution of complex engineering tasks....

Specifications

Model ID
openai/gpt-5.1-codex
Canonical ID
openai/gpt-5.1-codex-20251113
Creator
openai
Added to OpenRouter
13.11.2025
Context length
400,000
Modality
text+image->text
Input modalities
text, image
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $1.25 / out $10
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualityNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingNo measurement—
AgentsNo measurementparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurement—
VisionNo measurementinput: image
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurement—
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Design Arenaagents · fullstackwin rate 44.5% · rank 311,086EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · mobileappswin rate 53.4% · rank 221,191EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · webappswin rate 44% · rank 471,000EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 54.6% · rank 911,143EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · datavizwin rate 55.9% · rank 551,211EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 50.5% · rank 861,128EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 60% · rank 521,228EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 56.1% · rank 931,155EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
Azure400,000$1.25$10———

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026

No published articles identify this model yet.