That's NeuralModel catalog

meta

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

meta/muse-spark-1.1

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

The OpenRouter catalog describes meta/muse-spark-1.1 as a Meta multimodal reasoning model intended for agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video and files, including PDFs per the catalog description, and returns text. The catalog lists a context window of about one million tokens, mandatory reasoning with selectable effort levels, and support for tools plus structured outputs. Its benchmark entries cover coding, document and interface-generation tasks, but this pack contains no independent model card, so real-world fit should be validated.[1]

Strengths

  • Multimodal inputs—text, image, video and files—with text output, according to OpenRouter.[1]
  • Context window listed at one million tokens, which may help with large documents or multi-item inputs.[1]
  • Mandatory reasoning with several effort settings, plus tool use and structured-output parameters.[1]

Limitations

  • Evidence is catalog-only; no independent model card was supplied, so architecture, license, safety behavior and knowledge cutoff remain unreported.[1]
  • Reported benchmark coverage is limited to selected agentic, coding and design categories and may not predict performance on a target workload.[1]
  • Only text output is listed despite multimodal input.[1]

Where to use it

  • Potentially useful for multimodal question answering or summarization over long documents, images or video; validate accuracy on representative data.[1]
  • May fit agentic workflows that require reasoning controls, tool calls and structured text responses.[1]
  • Could be evaluated for code, data-visualization/interface or document-format generation tasks reflected in the catalog's benchmark categories.[1]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · Meta: Muse Spark 1.1Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

Muse Spark 1.1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta, built for agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, and PDF documents and returns text, with a 1M-token context window....

Specifications

Model ID
meta/muse-spark-1.1
Canonical ID
meta/muse-spark-1.1-20260709
Creator
meta
Added to OpenRouter
16.07.2026
Context length
1,048,576
Modality
text+image+file+video->text
Input modalities
text, image, video, file
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $1.25 / out $4.25
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualityNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low, minimal · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingAA — next 20% of the cohort—
AgentsBB — next 30% of the cohortparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low, minimal · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurementinput: file
VisionNo measurementinput: image
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurementinput: video
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisCoding index71.3AA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Artificial AnalysisAgentic index25.8BB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · agenticgamedevwin rate 48.5% · rank 121,132EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · androidnativewin rate 48.8% · rank 201,174EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · blender3dwin rate 35.9% · rank 191,009EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · codetovideowin rate 37% · rank 211,078EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · fullstackwin rate 44.6% · rank 211,175EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · godotgamedevwin rate 39.8% · rank 301,086EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · htmlslideswin rate 51.8% · rank 121,091EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · mobileappswin rate 46.2% · rank 261,172EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · pdfwin rate 47.1% · rank 231,144EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · python-pptxslideswin rate 44.4% · rank 231,118EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · spreadsheetwin rate 43.1% · rank 211,115EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · webappswin rate 48.7% · rank 241,189EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 48.5% · rank 341,241EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · asciiartwin rate 52.9% · rank 151,257EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 51.1% · rank 301,267EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · datavizwin rate 49.9% · rank 281,264EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 47.5% · rank 301,258EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · svgwin rate 49.1% · rank 211,225EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 51.2% · rank 271,281EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 51.5% · rank 311,264EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
Meta1,048,576$1.25$4.25——100%

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026

No published articles identify this model yet.