That's NeuralModel catalog

meta

Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B

meta/muse-glimmer-30b

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

Muse Glimmer 30B is Meta's open-weight (Apache 2.0), roughly 30-billion-parameter dense multimodal model, distilled from Muse Spark and built for autonomous agentic work on consumer hardware. Per its model card, it accepts interleaved text and images, emits text, supports a roughly 131K-token context, and uses always-on reasoning with selectable effort levels. Vendor-reported evaluations emphasize tool use, coding, and long-horizon tasks, while the OpenRouter catalog adds limited third-party arena and index measurements. Quantized variants and a speculative-decoding drafter target 24-32 GB memory envelopes.[1][2]

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for end-to-end agentic workflows: the model card reports reliable schema-based tool calling, multi-step planning over long horizons, and recovery when tool calls fail.[2]
  • A dedicated perception encoder accepts interleaved text and images (screenshots, charts, documents) within a roughly 131K-token context, per the catalog listing and model card.[1][2]
  • Designed for local deployment: 4-bit quantized builds and a companion drafter for block speculative decoding target consumer GPUs, with the vendor reporting minimal measured quality loss.[2]

Limitations

  • Evidence is mostly vendor-published plus a catalog listing; independent verification is thin, so benchmark claims and speed figures should be validated against your own workloads.[1][2]
  • The model card warns it can produce inaccurate, biased, or objectionable output, may err in multi-step reasoning on novel scenarios, processes video only as frames, and was not evaluated on all trained languages.[2]
  • Reasoning is mandatory rather than optional per the catalog, and the maker recommends deployment guardrails (e.g., confirmation for irreversible actions) instead of standalone use.[1][2]

Where to use it

  • Local coding and task-completion agents that plan, invoke tools, debug, and recover from errors without cloud infrastructure, as suggested by the provider's intended-use list.[2]
  • Multimodal assistants that interpret screenshots, charts, and documents alongside conversation in agentic or information-rich environments.[2]
  • Synthetic data generation or LLM-as-a-judge evaluation for downstream model development, suggested as a fit by the model card.[2]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · Meta: Muse Glimmer 30BSources checked: Nov 13, 2026
  2. [2] Model documentation · Meta: Muse Glimmer 30BSources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

Muse Glimmer 30B is a dense, open-weight multimodal model from Meta Superintelligence Labs, distilled from Muse Spark and optimized for autonomous agents on consumer hardware. It is suited for long-horizon...

Specifications

Model ID
meta/muse-glimmer-30b
Canonical ID
meta/muse-glimmer-30b-20260810
Creator
meta
Added to OpenRouter
09.08.2026
Context length
131,072
Modality
text+image->text
Input modalities
text, image
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $0.300 / out $1.2
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualityCC — below the B bandreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingBB — next 30% of the cohort—
AgentsBB — next 30% of the cohortparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default medium · efforts: xhigh, high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurement—
VisionNo measurementinput: image
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurement—
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisIntelligence index6.3CC — below the B band13.11.2026
Artificial AnalysisCoding index49BB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Artificial AnalysisAgentic index8.5BB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 26% · rank 1001,070EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 35.7% · rank 811,160EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 29.9% · rank 941,109EloCC — below the B band13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 39.6% · rank 631,198EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 39.1% · rank 731,186EloBB — next 30% of the cohort13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
DeepInfrabf16131,072$0.300$1.2——100%

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026