Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)
google/gemini-3-flash-preview:batch
Our take
AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.
According to OpenRouter's catalog, google/gemini-3-flash-preview:batch is a Google preview model listed for batch use. It accepts text, images, files, audio, and video, and produces text. The catalog describes it as a fast, cost-conscious thinking model for agentic workflows, multi-turn chat, and coding assistance; these are positioning claims, not verified here. Optional reasoning effort levels, tool calling, structured outputs, and a very large context window are listed. Only catalog data was supplied, so confirm behavior on your workloads.[1]
Strengths
Limitations
- Only OpenRouter catalog data was supplied; an independent model card was not available in this source pack.[1]
- Measured evidence is limited to selected design-arena categories; no broad benchmark suite or production evaluation was provided.[1]
- Batch execution semantics, output limits, and knowledge cutoff are unspecified; validate representative workloads before adoption.[1]
Where to use it
Sources
- [1] OpenRouter catalog · Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview (batch)Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026
About this model
Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is a high speed, high value thinking model designed for agentic workflows, multi turn chat, and coding assistance. It delivers near Pro level reasoning and tool...
Specifications
- Model ID
- google/gemini-3-flash-preview:batch
- Canonical ID
- google/gemini-3-flash-preview-20251217
- Creator
- Added to OpenRouter
- 17.12.2025
- Context length
- 1,048,576
- Modality
- text+image+file+audio+video->text
- Input modalities
- text, image, file, audio, video
- Output modalities
- text
- Token pricing
- USD per 1M tokens: in $0.250 / out $1.5
- Knowledge cutoff
- —
- Expiration date
- —
Tasks and capabilities
A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.
| Task | Grade | Source-declared capability |
|---|---|---|
| General quality | No measurement | reasoning: optional · default medium · efforts: high, medium, low, minimal, none · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort |
| Coding | No measurement | — |
| Agents | No measurement | parameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools |
| Writing | No measurement | output: text |
| Reasoning | No measurement | reasoning: optional · default medium · efforts: high, medium, low, minimal, none · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort |
| Document analysis | No measurement | input: file |
| Vision | No measurement | input: image |
| Image generation | No measurement | — |
| Audio | No measurement | input: audio |
| Video | No measurement | input: video |
| Embeddings | No measurement | — |
Evaluations
| Source | Benchmark | Value | Grade | Data retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena | agents · agenticslideswin rate 39.3% · rank 8 | 1,073Elo | —Not rated | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · agenticslides(python-pptx)win rate 39.3% · rank 8 | 1,075Elo | —Not rated | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · androidnativewin rate 47.7% · rank 41 | 1,034Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · fullstackwin rate 47.4% · rank 35 | 1,041Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · godotgamedevwin rate 50.6% · rank 17 | 1,161Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · mobileappswin rate 46.6% · rank 44 | 1,084Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · python-pptxslideswin rate 38.3% · rank 30 | 1,036Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | agents · webappswin rate 48.5% · rank 39 | 1,092Elo | CC — below the B band | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · 3dwin rate 62.7% · rank 63 | 1,166Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · codecategorieswin rate 57.6% · rank 68 | 1,180Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · gamedevwin rate 58.3% · rank 74 | 1,157Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
| Design Arena | models · websitewin rate 57% · rank 68 | 1,189Elo | BB — next 30% of the cohort | 13.11.2026 |
How grades work
Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.
- S — S — top 10% of the cohort
- A — A — next 20% of the cohort
- B — B — next 30% of the cohort
- C — C — below the B band
Providers
Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.
| Provider | Context length | Price in /1M | Price out /1M | Latency p50 (30m, s) | Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s) | Uptime (30m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,048,576 | $0.250 | $1.5 | — | — | — |
Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026
Related articles
No published articles identify this model yet.