That's NeuralModel catalog

anthropic

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5

Our take

AI-assisted analysis based on the sources below. Suitability is an editorial assessment; test it on your own workload.

Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 (anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5) is a Sonnet-class text-output model listed in the OpenRouter catalog as a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 5 for well-scoped everyday work. The catalog reports text, image, and file inputs, a one-million-token context window, mandatory reasoning with a configurable effort level, and support for tools and structured outputs. Design Arena entries recorded through OpenRouter cover agentic and generative tasks. No independent model card was available in this source pack, so claims rest on catalog data.[1]

Strengths

  • According to OpenRouter's catalog description, Anthropic positions it as especially strong at building features and fixing bugs, framed as a direct upgrade over Claude Sonnet 5.[1]
  • Catalog-reported capabilities include a 1,000,000-token context window and multimodal input of text, images, and files with text output.[1]
  • API features listed by OpenRouter include mandatory reasoning with selectable effort levels, tool calling, and structured outputs.[1]

Limitations

  • All evidence comes from the OpenRouter catalog; no independent model card was included in this source pack, so capabilities and benchmark entries should be validated on real workloads.[1]
  • The catalog marks reasoning as mandatory, which could increase latency and token usage compared with non-reasoning modes; this implication is inferred, not measured.[1]
  • Knowledge cutoff, license terms, and hardware requirements are not reported in the evidence.[1]

Where to use it

  • Editorial suggestion: feature development and bug fixing in existing codebases, matching the vendor-described strengths reported by OpenRouter.[1]
  • Editorial suggestion: agentic or design-oriented coding tasks such as code-to-video or UI component generation, where catalog-listed Design Arena entries exist; validate on your workload.[1]
  • Editorial suggestion: document- or image-aware workflows that need very long context, given the cataloged input modalities and context window.[1]

Sources

  1. [1] OpenRouter catalog · Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5Sources checked: Nov 13, 2026

About this model

Description below is the original text supplied by OpenRouter, shown in the source language.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is Anthropic's Sonnet-class model for well-scoped everyday work, succeeding Claude Sonnet 5 as a direct upgrade. It is especially strong at building features, fixing bugs, and producing...

Specifications

Model ID
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Canonical ID
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5-20260928
Creator
anthropic
Added to OpenRouter
28.09.2026
Context length
1,000,000
Modality
text+image+file->text
Input modalities
text, image, file
Output modalities
text
Token pricing
USD per 1M tokens: in $2 / out $10
Knowledge cutoff
—
Expiration date
—

Tasks and capabilities

A grade appears only where the source supplies a matching measurement for that task, the model is active and the cohort holds at least 10 comparable models. The capability column lists facts the source declares — supported formats, reasoning and tool parameters — which are not measured quality.

TaskGradeSource-declared capability
General qualitySS — top 10% of the cohortreasoning: mandatory · default high · efforts: max, xhigh, high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
CodingNo measurement—
AgentsNo measurementparameters: structured_outputs, tool_choice, tools
WritingNo measurementoutput: text
ReasoningNo measurementreasoning: mandatory · default high · efforts: max, xhigh, high, medium, low · parameters: include_reasoning, reasoning, reasoning_effort
Document analysisNo measurementinput: file
VisionNo measurementinput: image
Image generationNo measurement—
AudioNo measurement—
VideoNo measurement—
EmbeddingsNo measurement—

Evaluations

SourceBenchmarkValueGradeData retrieved
Artificial AnalysisIntelligence index54.5SS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · androidnativewin rate 58.6% · rank 61,260EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · blender3dwin rate 59.9% · rank 31,268EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · codetovideowin rate 70.9% · rank 21,318EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · mobileappswin rate 57.6% · rank 51,261EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · pdfwin rate 59.1% · rank 91,238EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · spreadsheetwin rate 53.6% · rank 71,287EloAA — next 20% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenaagents · webappswin rate 58.5% · rank 41,284EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · 3dwin rate 54.7% · rank 71,402EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · codecategorieswin rate 56% · rank 81,347EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · datavizwin rate 64.3% · rank 31,360EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · gamedevwin rate 59.9% · rank 61,391EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · svgwin rate 56.7% · rank 61,303EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · uicomponentwin rate 64.8% · rank 21,387EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
Design Arenamodels · websitewin rate 53.6% · rank 101,311EloSS — top 10% of the cohort13.11.2026
How grades work

Each letter grade compares a model only against other models scored by the same source and metric in the current snapshot. S means the top 10%, A the next 20%, B the next 30%, C the rest. Models without a published measurement are shown as not rated — a supported format alone never implies measured quality.

  • S — S — top 10% of the cohort
  • A — A — next 20% of the cohort
  • B — B — next 30% of the cohort
  • C — C — below the B band

Providers

Optional live provider statistics from OpenRouter. Missing values are unknown, not zero.

ProviderContext lengthPrice in /1MPrice out /1MLatency p50 (30m, s)Throughput p50 (30m, tok/s)Uptime (30m)
Google1,000,000$2$10——100%
Amazon Bedrock1,000,000$2$10——100%
Azure1,000,000$2$10——90.48%
Claude Platform on AWS1,000,000$2$10——96.67%
Anthropic1,000,000$2$10——90%
Amazon Bedrock1,000,000$2.2$11——100%
Amazon Bedrock1,000,000$2.2$11——100%
Google1,000,000$2.2$11——100%
Azure1,000,000$2.2$11———
Google1,000,000$2.2$11——100%

Provider data retrieved: 13.11.2026